Bazsi's Home Automation blog

I have finished IPv6 support for syslog-ng, I'm wondering how this will improve the number of people actually using the new syslog-ng 1.9.x tree. In the implementation I've created separate udp6() and tcp6() source and destination drivers, because this was somewhat easier to implement. I'm expecting some portability trouble, but otherwise the implementation is nice and simple. Some smaller fixes went in recently as well, like: avoid chown/chmod files that do not exist as it clobbered error reporting, added close-on-exec flag to file descriptors to avoid child processes to inherit tcp/udp connection fds, fixed an off-by-one in flush_lines calculation, a possible memory leak, and a fix for non-existing filter references in the internal() message path Apart from IPv6 support these are mainly bugfixes and I'm confident we can have a 2.0.0 real soon now.

I received an email last week asking about IPv6 support in syslog-ng. The question also referred to an IPv6 application page where most of the system logging applications were listed red showing that they lack IPv6 support. I started hacking on it but I thought I would ask you how important you think adding IPv6 support to syslog-ng is? My idea was to add tcp6() and udp6() source and destination drivers, however a lot of applications seem to do IPv6 support with a single listener, e.g. open an AF_INET6 socket and assume that the system shares IPv4 and IPv6 sockets. Which of the two approaches is preferable? The first gives more control the latter seems to be a bit easier to use, it works out of the box.

Just a quick one this time, I have released syslog-ng 1.9.10 available at the usual places . The release contains mainly bugfixes and an implementation of the previously missing netmask() filter and support for bad_hostname() and check_hostname() options.

As I have written in my previous post there was a timezone related problem triggered by one of the unit test programs of syslog-ng. Apart from a minor issue in the testprogram itself, it turned out that there's a timezone conversion problem at the reception of messages. Syslog-ng 1.9.x has support for messages that use the ISO 6501 timestamp. As an example the current local time here right now in ISO 6501 is: 2006-04-09T22:43:24+02:00. The important part is that it includes an explicit timezone offset. This offset is processed by syslog-ng and it can convert timezones when necessary. I spent about half a day to fix timezone conversion, I even used a pen and a sheet of paper to do some calculations. All I can say that there's an important building block missing from the POSIX time handling functions, which would have made my job as an application developer way easier: one that converts a broken down time representation to a UNIX time_t value, where the time to be converted is N

... but at the end I didn't. I prepared the NEWS file, changed version number etc, but the end it turned out that one of my unit test program which tests macro expansions failed. I still have not looked into the issue, hopefully it is only the test program, time related macros seem to use a bad timezone offset. Again I seem to have made a timezone related bug :( Although timezones and time related functions seem to be simple at first, it proved to be a problematic area, it already had a lot of bugs and again here is this one. Not to mention the problem that different platforms have different set of variables/functions to cover the issue. For instance "timezone" is a global variable on Linux and a function on BSD. Linux has a "tm_gmtoff" member in "struct tm", BSD doesn't. OK, I quit whining now :) Hopefully I'm going to have some free time to look into this bug in the nearfuture. I also have two other issues on my radar for syslog-ng 1.9.10, fi

I have hacked on our SSH gateway today to add publickey authentication support. By the way I may not have explained this before, so a short introduction is due: Zorp is an application layer gateway with support for 21 protocols, among them an SSH gateway capable of looking into the encrypted SSH stream and restricting the protocol to a subset that you really want to allow to your users. (e.g. you can forbid TCP port forwarding while still allowing terminal access). The problem with publickey authentication is that the signature covers the so called SSH session_id which is a unique value derived during key exchange. My proxy implements a man-in-the-middle, so the client<->proxy and proxy<->server connections have a different session id, thus simply replaying the authentication packets of the client will not work since the SSH session ids do not match. The solution is that we are going to replace user keys transparently when crossing the firewall, which means that private ke