Skip to main content

Troubleshooting our Buderus Logamatic 4000 based heating system, part V (temperature sensors)

In this series of blog posts I am revisiting the process of troubleshooting the heating system in our new house. In the past installments I've described the most important elements of the system (and the ones I fixed), since those didn't reveal the true issue with my heating, I needed to go on. This post is about my monitoring gear.

Temperature sensing was a key element of finding the solution.

First of all, I have a number of analogue temperature gauges around the boiler/furnace, each attached to a specific section of the system. What I had to learn was that these gauges are very slow to react, and thus were pretty much unusable for my goals. If your temperature has very low volatility, they might be fine, but if you want to understand how and why temperature changes, you will need something that gives you a reading every 10-30 seconds.



To address this problem I used a dormant Raspberry Pi and a pair or Onewire sensors I had lying around. These were of the type DS18B20, and I was using the one embedded in a waterproof probe:



Onewire sensors have 3 wires (in contrast with their name), two provides electricity (ground and 5v) and the 3rd wire being the data cable.


You can attach multiple devices to the same bus. Here is an article that shows how to connect them up. If you don't know how to solder, you can even buy a small PCB that let's you connect these up with screw terminals. Here is one similar to mine on AliExpress.



This is what it looks like when connected up:




And this is how I attached the probes to the location where the Buderus system was also measuring temperature:





With that installed, I was searching for something to store the readings and do simple charting. For that I simply used Homeassistant and its builtin history graph card.




Sorry for the messy labels on the screenshot. The upper left are the temperatures I watched most and were the forward/reverse temperatures going into the building (e.g. building secondary forward/reverse). The chart below that were the boiler's primary temperatures (boiler's temperature, building primary forward/reverse) and the one on the upper right is the temperature of our hot water. The chart above is not showing erratic behavior, simply because by this time I already resolved the issue.

To get the actual readings and make sure they reach Homeassistant, I was using a seemingly one-off project from github: rpi-temperature-mqtt and mosquitto as an MQTT broker.

This is the homeassistant configuration you need to instantiate an mqtt based sensor:

  - platform: mqtt
    name: Lakas eloremeno homerseklet
    state_topic: rpi/temperature_heating
    device_class: temperature
    unit_of_measurement: '°C'


I also changed rpi-temperature-mqtt a little, namely I've changed the time between two readings to 10 and then later 30 seconds

{
    "mqtt_client_id": "rpi",
    "mqtt_host": "mqtt.lan",
    "mqtt_port": "1883",
    "verbose": true,
    "wait_update": 30,
    "wait_process": 1,
    "sources": [
        {
          "serial": "28-02089245ceab",
          "topic": "rpi/temperature_heating"
        },
        {
          "serial": "28-020192453e12",
          "topic": "rpi/temperature_reverse"
        },
        {
          "serial": "28-01191f191d20",
          "topic": "rpi/temperature_smtg1"
        },
        {
          "serial": "28-0119277400b2",
          "topic": "rpi/temperature_smtg2"
        },
        {
          "serial": "28-0119277d311b",
          "topic": "rpi/temperature_smtg3"
        },
        {
          "serial": "28-0119277e5d25",
          "topic": "rpi/temperature_smtg4"
        },
        {
          "serial": "28-0119279226b9",
          "topic": "rpi/temperature_smtg5"
        }
      ]
}


Please note that even though rpi-temperature-mqtt is available in PyPI (e.g. a pip install away) that is a bit outdated compared to the version on github.

With this setup I could truly start the troubleshooting process and actually fix the heating issue(s) I had. But more on those in the next episode.

Comments

ahmed said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Popular posts from this blog

syslog-ng fun with performance

I like christmas for a number of reasons: in addition to the traditional "meet and have fun with your family", eat lots of delicious food and so on, I like it because this is the season of the year when I have some time to do whatever I feel like. This year I felt like doing some syslog-ng performance analysis. After reading Ulrich Deppert's series about stuff "What every programmer should know about memory" on LWN, I thought I'm more than prepared to improve syslog-ng performance. Before going any further, I'd recommend this reading to any programmer, it's a bit long but every second reading it is worth it. As you need to measure performance in order to improve it, I wrote a tool called "loggen". This program generates messages messages at a user-specifyable rate. Apart from the git repository you can get this tool from the latest syslog-ng snapshots. Loggen supports TCP, UDP and UNIX domain sockets, so really almost everything can be me

syslog-ng roadmap 2.1 & 2.2

We had a meeting on the syslog-ng roadmap today where we decided some important things, and I thought I'd use this channel to tell you about it. The Open Source Edition will see a 2.1 release incorporating all core changes currently in the Premium Edition and additionally the SQL destination driver. We are going to start development on the 2.2 PE features, but some of those will also be incorporated in the open source version: support for the latest work of IETF syslog protocols unique sequence numbering for messages support for parsing message contents Previously syslog-ng followed the odd/even version numbering to denote development/stable releases. I'm going to abandon this numbering now: the next syslog-ng OSE release is going to have a 2.1 version number and will basically come out with tested code changes only. The current feature set in PE were developed in a closed manner and I don't want to repeat this mistake. The features that were decided to be part of the Open

syslog-ng 3.0 and SNMP traps

Last time I've written about how syslog-ng is able to change message contents. I thought it'd be useful to give you a more practical example, instead of a generic description. It is quite common to convert SNMP traps to syslog messages. The easiest implementation is to run snmptrapd and have it create a log message based on the trap. There's a small issue though: snmptrapd uses the UNIX syslog() API, and as such it is not able to propagate the originating host of the SNMP trap to the hostname portion of the syslog message. This means that all traps are logged as messages coming from the host running snmptrapd, and the hostname information is part of the message payload. Of course it'd be much easier to process syslog messages, if this were not the case. A solution would be to patch snmptrapd to send complete syslog frames, but that would require changing snmptrapd source. The alternative is to use the new parse and rewrite features of syslog-ng 3.0. First, you need to f