Skip to main content

Migrate over to PCRE?

As of now the development of the generic rewrite feature has been completed in one of my private git repositories. The new code uses PCRE and I'm somewhat undecided how to move forward with PCRE.

For those who might not know PCRE is an implementation of regular expressions and is an acronym for "Perl Compatible Regular Expressions". PCRE adds a lot more features and seems to perform better than its POSIX equivalent.

So the situation is as follows:
  • various filters use POSIX regexps
  • rewrite uses PCRE
This is not a very consistent combination, thus I'm planning to add PCRE support for filters too. The only question is whether it is needed to have two independent regexp styles in syslog-ng in the long run.

If I decide that one of them is enough, then I'd deprecate POSIX style regexps in filters and wouldn't implement POSIX in rewrite rules. This combination would yield a syslog-ng that would give warnings when POSIX-style regular expressions are in use and in a forthcoming release I'd change the default regexp style to PCRE, and yet another syslog-ng release later, I'd phase out POSIX completely.

If the decision is to keep them both in the long run, it would mean that I'd need to implement POSIX style regexps for rewrite rules as well. This would probably the least intrusive for users, but also a lot more work. Also, this would allow adding other filtering options like globbing or prefix search.

What do you think? Is the addition of modular search algorithms worth it?

Please send your opinions to the mailing list: syslog-ng@lists.balabit.hu
Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
only support pcre - it's way better and porting existing POSIX regular expressions is not difficult for end users.

if they are advanced enough to create POSIX filters, they can surely port them to PCRE
1:41 AM
p6drapulm said…
i would vote for only pcre as well.
4:24 PM
Anonymous said…
100% PCRE would be best.
6:20 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

syslog-ng fun with performance

I like christmas for a number of reasons: in addition to the traditional "meet and have fun with your family", eat lots of delicious food and so on, I like it because this is the season of the year when I have some time to do whatever I feel like. This year I felt like doing some syslog-ng performance analysis. After reading Ulrich Deppert's series about stuff "What every programmer should know about memory" on LWN, I thought I'm more than prepared to improve syslog-ng performance. Before going any further, I'd recommend this reading to any programmer, it's a bit long but every second reading it is worth it. As you need to measure performance in order to improve it, I wrote a tool called "loggen". This program generates messages messages at a user-specifyable rate. Apart from the git repository you can get this tool from the latest syslog-ng snapshots. Loggen supports TCP, UDP and UNIX domain sockets, so really almost everything can be me
17 comments
Read more

syslog-ng roadmap 2.1 & 2.2

We had a meeting on the syslog-ng roadmap today where we decided some important things, and I thought I'd use this channel to tell you about it. The Open Source Edition will see a 2.1 release incorporating all core changes currently in the Premium Edition and additionally the SQL destination driver. We are going to start development on the 2.2 PE features, but some of those will also be incorporated in the open source version: support for the latest work of IETF syslog protocols unique sequence numbering for messages support for parsing message contents Previously syslog-ng followed the odd/even version numbering to denote development/stable releases. I'm going to abandon this numbering now: the next syslog-ng OSE release is going to have a 2.1 version number and will basically come out with tested code changes only. The current feature set in PE were developed in a closed manner and I don't want to repeat this mistake. The features that were decided to be part of the Open
12 comments
Read more

syslog-ng 3.0 and SNMP traps

Last time I've written about how syslog-ng is able to change message contents. I thought it'd be useful to give you a more practical example, instead of a generic description. It is quite common to convert SNMP traps to syslog messages. The easiest implementation is to run snmptrapd and have it create a log message based on the trap. There's a small issue though: snmptrapd uses the UNIX syslog() API, and as such it is not able to propagate the originating host of the SNMP trap to the hostname portion of the syslog message. This means that all traps are logged as messages coming from the host running snmptrapd, and the hostname information is part of the message payload. Of course it'd be much easier to process syslog messages, if this were not the case. A solution would be to patch snmptrapd to send complete syslog frames, but that would require changing snmptrapd source. The alternative is to use the new parse and rewrite features of syslog-ng 3.0. First, you need to f
2 comments
Read more