Skip to main content

LWN: syslog-ng rotten to the (Open) Core?

This was first posted as a comment under an article on lwn.net, but I thought it was important enough to post it here for others not reading lwn. Please go ahead and read the original article which is about the "Open Core" business model and its problems from the Free Software community point of view.

A commenter thought that syslog-ng was an example, which only exists as a marketing tool for the company's commercial offering. Anyway, here's my post:

First of all, I want to make it clear that I'm biased on the syslog-ng case, but still wanted to express my opinion here. I'm biased as I'm the primary author of syslog-ng.

I think syslog-ng is a completely different case from the one described by Neary. The GPL version is not crippleware, it was never published for marketing purposes only and for the majority of syslog-ng's existence only the Open Source stuff existed. The Premium Edition is only about 3 years old and syslog-ng started in 1998.

We never removed features from the OSE version, the Premium Edition only included _additional_ features, and a lot of those are already available in the OSE.

Some examples:
* TLS support (became available in 3.0, almost 2 years ago)
* SQL destination (became available in 2.1, 2.5 years ago)
* performance improvements (3.0)
* etc.

In the other direction, we usually receive bugfixes and it is a pure technical reason that we used to require copyright assignment: I wanted to keep the two branches as close as possible (which if not done is the reason #1 why Open Core products become crippleware fast). _And_ since we heavily invested in automatic testing and our customers report bugs directly to us, we fix way more bugs in the OSE version than the community.

But anyway, I didn't think that the dual license model was so problematic at the time we made this decision 3 years ago. Our efforts have never been "Rotten to the Open Core". If you don't believe that, check out the git repository or read the mailing list archive and see it yourself.

And this whole mess is the past, OSE 3.2 has been relicensed, and it is true that we're going to publish non-free plugins, but anyone else is welcome to join and do the same.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

syslog-ng fun with performance

I like christmas for a number of reasons: in addition to the traditional "meet and have fun with your family", eat lots of delicious food and so on, I like it because this is the season of the year when I have some time to do whatever I feel like. This year I felt like doing some syslog-ng performance analysis. After reading Ulrich Deppert's series about stuff "What every programmer should know about memory" on LWN, I thought I'm more than prepared to improve syslog-ng performance. Before going any further, I'd recommend this reading to any programmer, it's a bit long but every second reading it is worth it. As you need to measure performance in order to improve it, I wrote a tool called "loggen". This program generates messages messages at a user-specifyable rate. Apart from the git repository you can get this tool from the latest syslog-ng snapshots. Loggen supports TCP, UDP and UNIX domain sockets, so really almost everything can be me...

syslog-ng contributions redefined

syslog-ng has been around for about 12 years now, but I think the biggest change in the project's life is imminent: with the upcoming release of syslog-ng OSE 3.2, syslog-ng will become an independent entity. Until now, syslog-ng was primarily maintained & developed by BalaBit, copyrights needed to be reassigned in order to grant BalaBit special privileges. BalaBit used her privileges to create a dual-licensed fork of syslog-ng, named "syslog-ng Premium Edition". The value we offer over the Open Source Edition of syslog-ng are things that larger enterprises require: support on a large number of UNIX platforms (27 as of 3.1), smaller and larger feature differences (like the encrypted/digitally signed logfile feature) better test coverage and release management longer term support Although perfectly legal, this business model was not welcome in various Free Software communities, and has caused friction and harm, because BalaBit has enjoyed a privilege that no others cou...

syslog-ng message parsing

Earlier this month, I announced the new syslog-ng 3.0 git tree, adding a lot of new features to syslog-ng Open Source Edition. I thought it'd be useful to describe the new features with some more details, so this time I'd write about message parsing. First of all, the message structure was a bit generalized in syslog-ng. Earlier it was encapsulating a syslog message and had little space to anything beyond that. That is, every log message that syslog-ng handled had date, host , program and message fields, but syslog-ng didn't care about message contents. This has changed, a LogMessage became a set of name-value pairs , with some "built-in" pairs that correspond to the parts of a syslog message. The aim with this change is: new name-value pairs can be associated with messages through the use of a parsing. It is now possible to parse non-syslog logs and use the columns the same way you could do it with syslog fields. Use them in the name of files, SQL tables or c...